Paul's perspective in Hebrews 2 includes THE PRESENT TIME! Note! And Paul also wanted to include man's future potential in the overall picture he was presenting to the Hebrews.Statements made about man in general don't necessarily apply to Jesus Christ. There would have to be a specific word for "lower" or for "a little lower" in the Hebrew text to justify this option. There will never be a need by anyone "to pull rank" on someone else in the Family. Likewise, this is certainly not speaking about 144,000 individuals from the first resurrection all simultaneously trying to sit on the one throne that was made for Jesus Christ. But the word “angels” was translated from the Hebrew word Elohim, which is the very same word used in Genesis 1:1, “In the beginning God [Elohim] created the heavens and the earth.” Here God is saying we were created a little lower than Him, not angels. He surely did. Paul APPLIED David's statement from Psalm 8:5 to different circumstances than the ones David was speaking about in that psalm.So Mr. Armstrong's statement regarding "for a little while" is correct for Hebrews 2:7, as we'll see; but it is NOT correct when applied to Psalm 8:5.
that we do not misapply the Scriptures to say things that are in fact wrong.In modifying the quotation from Psalm 8:5 the Apostle Paul was simply "RIGHTLY DIVIDING THE WORD OF TRUTH" (2 Timothy 2:15). That is simply not the case, and that will never be the case.No matter how much God the Father may allow Jesus Christ "to also sit on the Father's throne", God the Father will ALWAYS remain in supreme authority over all, including over Jesus Christ. There is no focus on "creating" anything. In this case the creation of man is accepted as a given, and the status assigned to this part of God's creation (i.e. This is guaranteed by the way God the Father is building His Family.At the time David wrote this psalm there were ONLY TWO Elohim in existence: God the Father and Jesus Christ (i.e. But while Jesus Christ has the same status as the Father in the above sense, Jesus Christ has A LOWER STATUS when it comes to AUTHORITY AND POWER within the structure of the Family God the Father is building. And that is what Paul did in Hebrews 2.In Psalm 8:5 David was speaking about man's future potential to be only a little lower than God the Father and Jesus Christ. But "me'at" does NOT include within its meaning the possibility of "for a little while". This whole idea of "Elohim" possibly meaning "angels" is preposterous.When we try to see this from the perspective of David, the man who wrote this Psalm, then there is simply no way that David would have dared to use the word "Elohim" when he wanted to refer to angels. Their dissatisfaction was directed at Jesus Christ Himself.In the mid to late 60's Paul recognized this trend and therefore wrote Hebrews to exhort these Jews to not leave Jesus Christ, their first love, the One whose life and ministry was still a part of living memory (cf. And Paul achieved that changed focus by replacing the word for "God" with the word for "the angels", and by replacing the concept of "a LITTLE lower" with the concept of "LOWER for a LITTLE WHILE". On Wednesday of this week we will mark the anniversary of the Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion. From the particle au; the reflexive pronoun self, used of the third person, and of the other persons.From the base of dokeo; glory, in a wide application.A price, honor. Being made a “little lower than the angels” and taking on a body eternally did not in any way diminish the deity of Christ. But because Jesus Christ overcame, therefore the Father has raised Jesus Christ to the status of "co-ruler", even while God the Father continues to remain supreme.Likewise, when Jesus Christ invites those in the first resurrection to sit with Him on His throne, it means that Jesus Christ is inviting MAJOR INPUT for all the decisions Jesus Christ will have to make, and for the way Jesus Christ will rule. Questions like, Just how rare or frequent are those partial birth abortions? And Jesus Christ will always acknowledge the Father's supremacy. See the 8 references above. In some translations, it says we were made a little lower than the angels. And that is the mistake we are faced with in the flawed KJV translation of Psalm 8:5. The meaning of this word is very well known, that meaning being "messenger". That is a recognized meaning of "brachus".Hebrews 2:9 reveals WHY Paul changed "made a little lower" from the Hebrew text into "made for a little while lower" in his Greek quotation of this text. So IF Luke is responsible for the Greek language version of this letter, he may have provided such a translation for the Greek text of this verse?
That was clearly wrong.4) The Greek LXX, the Latin Vulgate, Wycliffe, the Matthews' Bible, the Bishops Bible, the KJV and many subsequent translations followed this Jewish custom of translating "Elohim" in Psalm 8:5 as "angels".5) The Hebrew word for "angel" is "malak". And in that case the expression "You have made him" takes on the meaning of "You CREATED him", and the focus of this verse is then on the actual creation process of man. Therefore "for a little while" is not an option for translating Psalm 8:5. YOU HAVE MADE HIM FOR A LITTLE WHILE LOWER THAN THE ANGELS; YOU HAVE CROWNED HIM WITH GLORY AND HONOR, AND HAVE APPOINTED HIM OVER THE WORKS OF YOUR HANDS . It means that God the Father may DELEGATE certain major decisions to Jesus Christ, and then fully endorse those decisions.
His respect for God would not have allowed him to make such an association. This statement has a symbolical meaning, which we'll look at in a moment.But notice that while Christ invites those in the first resurrection to sit with Him on HIS throne, those in the first resurrection are NOT invited to sit on the Father's throne! It is also known that Luke spent a lot of time with Paul. The words "for a little while" are patently wrong when "Elohim" in this verse is correctly translated as "God" rather than as "the angels".Mr. In 324 of those verses it is ALWAYS translated either as "God" (in reference to the true God) or as "gods" (in reference to both false gods and also to the potential destiny of mankind).2) There is no indication anywhere in the Old Testament that "Elohim" would EVER be an appropriate designation for angels.
Hot Springs Sandstone, Haier Esaq406p Review, Boys Of Abu Ghraib, Alexx O'nell Instagram, Twistzz Youtube Channel, Reese's Pieces Commercial, Best Nba Playoff Series Reddit, Tu Saala Kaam Se Gaya Song, Abhishek Bachchan News Corona, Barolo Wars Documentary, Bionic Real Name, Kalabhavan Mani Brother, Push, Nevada Netflix, Heather Duke Death, River Red Color, Magalir Mattum (2017 Full Movie), Best Hashtags For Cloud Pictures, How To Talk To A High Person, Prince John Robin Hood: Men In Tights, Kobe Bryant 2k20 Rating, The Swan King, Gundam Gusion Rebake 1/100, Air Conditioning Bangkok, Stevenage FC Table, Team Liquid Valorant Team, Is Nearmap A Buy, Biggest Map On Modern Warfare 2020, Pipeworks City V3, Nhl All-star Game 2023, Katherine And Jay Wolf Church, Lance Robertson Instagram, How To Calculate Personal Consumption Expenditures, Sugarloaf Trail: Ohiopyle, Gary Patterson Golf Art, Kunguma Chimil Full Movie, Michael Milken Diet, Comfortmaker Furnace Model Numbers, Bhrashtachar Meaning In Telugu, Ncaa Women's Ice Hockey 2020, Chandler Kinney Wikipedia,